Liberals use the children as an emotional rationale for all of their political crusades.  Because liberalism can’t be defended based on either logic or phenomenological data, liberals have to always keep people from thinking about liberal objectives, and the best way to do that is to emotionalize any issue by bringing in children.

Liberals have even argued that abortion is good for children.  When liberals were trying to legalize abortion, they argued that abortion would end child abuse because every child would be a wanted child.  They no longer use that argument much, since child abuse has skyrocketed since abortion was legalized (no surprise — if you can kill your daughter up to the moment of birth, why can’t you punch her when she’s three?).  Those same liberals who were essentially saying that they had to kill children to save them mocked the U.S. military in Vietnam by citing the following supposed quote:

It became necessary to destroy the town to save it.

It takes chutzpah to say that we must kill children to save children, but that has never held back liberals.  Of course, people who really care about children would never advocate killing some to save others; liberals are like the false mother in the story of Solomon.

Continue…